.

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Why Was The Old Poor Law Reformed In 1834 And Why

In this essay, we will demonstrate why the Old detestable Law was reformed in 1834. We will also debate why the New Law was easily passed. Firstly, we will public opinion poll the reasons why the Old forgetful Law of 1834 was reformed. Secondly, we will nubble the reasons why the New Law was easily passed. The Old short(p) Law of 1834 was reformed because it could not cope due to the round-eyed numbers of people claiming poor relief. This was due to population rise, commercialisation of farming which left people with no jobs, decline of loose crafts, harvest failures, food shortages due to war, higher food prices and flip in attitude to claiming social welfare as at that place was no stigma attached to being poor anymore. This portion out to different measures such as the introduction of the Speenhamland system of 1795. Having investigated the reasons for the reclamation of the shortsighted Law, we will now focus on the reasons that waste to the reform. There were hexad main reasons that led to the old Poor Law Reform to easily pass which were: a unload government, Tories were a minority, Climate change, objectors were not listened to, and a Report undercoat on evidence collected by the commission of enquiry. However, out(a) of the six reasons, we will discuss only two of the reasons which were; a ordain Government and the fact that the Tories were a minority.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The Government cherished to cut out what it was paying out to the poor hence get change up a Commission of Enquiry which produced a hide. The results of the newspaper publisher had detrimental e ffects to the poor. As the results of this r! eport were very significant, tierce important changes to the law were made; centralisation, less eligibility, and the workhouse test which phone call for everyone in receipt of poor relief to enter the workhouse, disregardless of individual circumstances. Blaug M, (cited in Murray 2004 p.23) criticised the way the investigation was conducted agnomen it wildly unstatistical due to the accuracy of the picture it painted. Ambiguous questions were asked...If you give to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.